Subscribe to the Newspaper
View the Online Newspaper
Publish your Stuff
Need Help? Click Here
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Group raps ADOT's wish list for stimulus package

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Daily News-Sun

A lobbying organization thinks the Arizona Department of Transportation is heading down the wrong road.

State officials have compiled a list of projects that could be funded under a federal economic stimulus package, with an estimated price tag of $1.2 billion. But the Arizona Public Interest Research Group thinks the list is too heavy on black asphalt with not enough green alternatives.

"Arizona should be spending more on public transit, which not only would create more jobs, but would also reduce traffic, air pollution, and our dependence on oil," AZ PIRG spokesman Alex Nelson said in a statement released Wednesday.

But ADOT spokesman Doug Nintzel said the report was premature, in that no one knows what form a stimulus package will take. He also said some of PIRG's accusations were misguided because ADOT doesn't do much with transit.

"We're not a transit operator," Nintzel said, although he acknowledged ADOT's roles in transit planning and distribution of transit funding.

In the Valley, Maricopa County and its municipalities are responsible for transit.

The Maricopa Association of Governments, in its federal wish list, has compiled more than $1.8 billion worth of transit projects. That represents nearly 26 percent of the total cost for all of MAG's projects.

Five major West Valley road projects totaling more than $287 million are among those on the list state transportation officials hope will be financed through a proposed federal stimulus package.

The largest price tag for a West Valley project is $146 million to build 17 miles of Loop 303 from Lake Pleasant Road to I-17. The Sun Cities would be directly affected by two items on the list: $42 million to widen Grand Avenue from 99th Avenue to Loop 303 and $13 million to widen Grand from 83rd to 99th avenues.

The criticism of ADOT was part of a national effort by PIRG to shift the emphasis toward transit and away from roads and highways.

PIRG examined the lists of transportation projects on which funds could be spent if made available from 18 states, including Arizona, constituting 56 percent of the U.S. population. The organization said the average state would spend more than 77 percent of funds on highways and only 17 percent on public transit or intercity rail.

Arizona has a highways-to-transit funding request ratio of $869 million to $8.5 million, making it one of seven states studied allocating 1 percent or less to transit, PIRG said.

Nelson said Arizona is missing a big opportunity in not asking for a study of a Phoenix-Tucson passenger rail line to be funded. The federal government already has pledged matching funds for such a study, if it is ever undertaken.

But the state and local officials have said the federal government's emphasis is directed toward projects that are "shovel-ready" - and that rail line is definitely not.

PIRG also criticized Arizona and other states for their emphasis on the construction of new roads and highways, rather than the repair and improvement of what already exists. Nelson said the economic impact of maintenance is 9 percent greater than new construction, as much of the latter's costs stem from the acquisition of land.


See archived 'Local News' stories »
 


Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


ADVERTISEMENT 
Publish your Stuff (beta)
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Breast cancer exams
Do you agree with a federal panel's recommendation that mammograms are used too early, too often?
Yes
No
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site